The new ATN Thor 4 384 and 640 thermal imaging cameras promise to revolutionize the way we see the world around us, but which one is right for you? Here’s a quick look at the differences between these two models to help you decide.
The ATN Thor 4 384 uses a 320×256 sensor to capture images, while the 640 model ups the ante with a 640×512 sensor.
That means that the latter provides double the resolution of the former, making it ideal for those who want to see more detail in their thermal images. Both cameras offer 12-micron pixel pitch for clear imagery, but the 640 model’s higher resolution gives it an edge when it comes to identifying smaller objects or details within larger objects. If you’re looking for a camera that can do double duty as both a day and night vision device, then the ATN Thor 4 640 is probably your best bet.
When it comes to night vision, there are two main types of devices: those that use thermal imaging and those that use image intensification. Thermal imagers work by detecting the infrared radiation emitted by objects, while image intensifiers amplify available light to produce a clearer image. So, which is better?
There is no clear answer, as each type of device has its own advantages and disadvantages. Thermal imagers don’t require any external light source, so they can be used in complete darkness. However, they can be expensive and their images can sometimes be hard to interpret.
Image intensifiers, on the other hand, are less expensive and their images are usually easier to understand. But they require some level of ambient light in order to work properly. So, which is better for you?
It depends on your specific needs and application. If you need a night vision device for use in complete darkness, then a thermal imager is probably your best bet. But if you’re looking for something that’s less expensive and easier to use, then an image intensifier might be a better choice.
ATN Thor 4 comparison 640 vs 384
Atn Thor 4 Vs Pulsar Thermion 2
In the world of thermal riflescopes, there are a few names that stand out above the rest. Two of those brands are ATN and Pulsar. Both companies make high-quality products that are popular with consumers.
So, which one is better? In this article, we’ll compare the ATN Thor 4 vs Pulsar Thermion 2 to see which one comes out on top. Both the Thor 4 and the Thermion 2 use uncooled microbolometer technology to detect infrared energy.
This allows them to create an image of their target, even in complete darkness. The Thor 4 has a resolution of 640×480, while the Thermion 2 has a slightly higher resolution of 1024×768. However,resolution isn’t everything when it comes to these types of devices.
One advantage that the Thor 4 has over the Thermion 2 is its integrated gyroscope and e-compass. This allows the scope to stabilize itself, which is helpful if you’re trying to take a shot from a moving vehicle or platform. The Thor 4 also has built-in wifi, so you can connect it to your smartphone or tablet and use ATN’s Obsidian app for remote viewing and control.
The Pulsar Thermion 2 also has some impressive features, including recoil activated video (RAV), which starts recording automatically when it detects muzzle blast from your firearm. It also has stream vision, which lets you connect it to your mobile device and view live footage from the scope (up to 100 yards away). And like the Thor 4, it too has an integrated gyroscope for stabilization purposes.
So, which one should you buy? If you’re looking for sheer performance, then go with the Pulsar Thermion 2 – its higher resolution sensor will give you better image quality than the Thor 4’s sensor (although both are still quite good). But if you want a scope with more bells and whistles – like WiFi connectivity and recoil activation – then go with ATN’sThor 4 .
Can Atn Thor 4 Be Used in Daylight?
ATN ThOR 4 is a thermal imaging scope that can be used in both daylight and nighttime conditions. It has a number of features that make it ideal for use in both scenarios, including an advanced reticle system, which allows for more precise aiming, and a wide field of view. The scope also has a number of different color modes that can be used to optimize image quality in different lighting conditions.
Are Atn Thor Scopes Any Good?
ATN ThOR scopes are some of the best in the business. They offer a wide variety of features that make them perfect for any situation. Whether you need a scope for long range shooting or close quarters combat, ATN has you covered.
Their scopes are made with high quality materials and come with a variety of different reticles to choose from. If you’re looking for a top notch scope, then ATN ThOR is definitely worth checking out.
How Far Can You Shoot With Atn Thor Lt?
ATN ThOR LT is a long-range Thermal Rifle Scope that can detect heat signatures from up to 2,000 yards away. It has a variety of features that make it ideal for hunting, including a color display, image enhancement, and on-screen display.
What Should I Look for When Buying a Thermal Scope?
When looking to buy a thermal scope there are a few key features you should look for. Firstly, make sure the scope has good resolution. This means that it can pick up on small changes in heat, which is essential for seeing game or targets at long range.
Secondly, check that the scope has a wide field of view. This will allow you to see more of your surroundings and spot game more easily. Finally, make sure the scope is durable and weatherproof so that it can withstand harsh conditions.
When it comes to night vision, there are two main types of devices: those that use image intensifier tubes, and those that don’t. Image intensifier tubes take the light that’s available and amplify it, which is why they’re often referred to as “light amplifiers.” On the other hand, thermal imaging cameras don’t need any light at all—they detect heat signatures.
So, which is better? It depends on what you’re looking for. If you need to see in very low-light conditions or in complete darkness, then an image intensifier is probably your best bet.
But if you’re looking for something that can see through smoke, fog, or even walls, then a thermal imager is likely a better choice.